Back
~
2
min read
· Posted on
February 21, 2024

Meat industry has major beef with plant-based foodies telling porkies

The sale of plant-based dairy and meat alternatives is expected to reach US$162 billion by 2030.

What's the key learning?

  • Currently, there's a senate inquiry into whether plant-based food producers should be able to use words associated with animals on their packaging
  • The meat industry reckons plant-based manufacturers shouldn't be allowed to piggyback off their branding
  • Piggyback branding is when a company launches a brand that's designed to feel similar to a known, successful brand.

Background: Plant-based dairy and meat alternatives reached sales of US$30 billion in 2020...and that number is expected to increase to US$162 billion by 2030.

What happened: But one thing could slow the market: branding. Currently, there's a senate inquiry into whether plant-based food producers should be able to use words associated with animals on their packaging (i.e. 'beef' or 'sausage').

What else: The meat industry reckons plant-based manufacturers shouldn't be allowed to piggyback off their branding.

So what's the key learning?

💡Piggyback branding is when a company launches a brand that's designed to feel similar to a known, successful brand (or theme). Sometimes it can be positive (like leveraging a new trend) but other times, it can mislead people into making a purchase.

💡Piggybacking isn't unique to Australian plant-based manufacturers. In fact, in the US, dairy farmers have been battling plant-based milk companies over their use of the word 'milk' when almonds, ya know, don't lactate.

💡While piggybacking can be a dangerous game, there is a fine line between taking a stand...and protectionism.

Ready to win at money?

Sign up for Flux and join 100,000 members of the Flux family

A button to App StoreGoogle Play store button
Excellent  4.9 out of 5
Star rating